
Mathematics of religious-ism
Disclaimer:
If you’re a narrow minded, who expects everyone to convert to your religion
because you think it’s the best solution to all world problems, kindly leave
this page.Today,
I’m calling out people who have been the culprits of inter-faith arguments over
the years. Please read on and help me identify anyone you may know.
1) I read a ridiculous article online
yesterday. A so-called “Muslim” preacher trying to ridicule Hinduism through
slides and presentation of our pantheon. I quote, “ The reason I’m doing this
is not to ridicule other religion but to help people realize the beauty of
Islam”. Help me make sense. How does ridiculing other religion help enhance
one’s belief in a different religion? Even if does, how could anyone compare
two completely different religions and arrive at a conclusion? I call these
people, “Skewed-boxplots”. “Skewed”
because they are prejudiced, biased and refuse to understand other religions in
their own terms. “Boxplots” only because they live in their own rectangular
world with perfect edges, pushing other religions to the furthest point
possible. Now, don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against Muslim preachers. I
went to a 99.9% Muslim populated boarding school, and I had a great time learning
about Islam. In fact, my close friends are Muslims who earned my respect. What I’m against here is ridiculing other
religions regardless of your affiliations.
2) Next up is my personal favorite. I call
them, “lower-rangers”. They are people
who are who scout the Internet for articles relating to their religions and
constantly share it in an attempt to spread awareness or think themselves as
“rangers” of their religion. Now, again don’t get me wrong. Sharing it is
perfectly fine; in fact, I like to read different articles about different
religion. Problem here is when you share without researching. Thousand of
people these days, self-proclaim themselves to be religious masters. Some who
actually spend time researching and analyzing claims, while the others who
“lower” their researching habits and merely share and like articles that might
not even be from the right source. In the end, everyone loses out. A foreign
reader might assume what you share is right, while a believer might think you
are spreading the wrong information, causing further conflict.
3) Meet the complete opposite,
“higher-rangers”. These people often appear to be completely well read and knowledgeable
people who have obtained multiplied degrees from various institutions around
the world. Yet, they have a habit of sharing their “high” collection of
knowledge and expect people to embrace them as the ultimate fact. Even better,
they often use their intelligence or credentials as an advantage to allure
crowds to belief their “facts”. Often times, the “lower-rangers” fall prey for
these people, accepting blindly everything that comes under the label religion.
4) Finally, let me introduce the “medians”.
These are people who choose to remain neutral throughout their life. People who
know real facts, or experiences that can help educate other people, but choose
to remain silent. I guess, it’s true what people say, silent people are indeed
the people who gets the most out of everything. I have to admit, I often fall
under this category. Not because of my “knowledge” but because I choose to
remain silent. I’ve always thought educating people might not bring any
difference. Especially if they have not been exposed to diverse cultures as I
did. The thing is, I’m beginning to realize that all these years of silence has
only helped two things; ignorance and religious-ism. I feel the guilt when close friends do not
understand religious differences. More than that, I feel burdened by the
thought that these people will be parents and pass down their mentality to
children.
Thousand of
people live in fear to practice their religions or even to admit they do not
believe in any religion. I often question myself, what is the purpose of
religion? To me, religion is an individual process, which provides a guide to
our spiritual journey. In the end, it doesn’t matter what religion you are, but
how far have you advanced spiritually. You know you are in the right track, if
you could detach yourself from your routines and see the world as a beautiful
picture it is, and thank the “painter” behind it.
So, the
solution for religious-ism is simple.
“Skewed-Boxplots” needs to be eliminated. How? “Lower-ranger” need to
step up their game by researching and be careful about what they share.
“Higher-rangers” need to stop acting superior and respect others as also being
able to contribute. Most importantly, medians need to break their silence and
start explaining when you need to. Increase your “lower rangers” and decrease
your “higher rangers”, and take away “medians” and close the gaps between the
“skewed boxplots”. All you get is a straight line. Everyone perfectly aligned
in a single line pointing upwards towards a better humanity.
the illustration of skewed box plot...i loikee it! Sebarkan yang baik tak salah, provokasi terhadap hak & agama orang lain yang mengundang padah...:(
ReplyDeleteWell. As always, you've got it right on. This is a really good piece of work. I think religion has the power to seperate people more than anything else. And sometimes I tend to wonder, what kind of place will the world be, without religion and perhaps, faith in an individual called God?
ReplyDelete